Sexual practices Frot

-



1 sexual practices

1.1 general
1.2 safe sex
1.3 comparison anal sex , debates





sexual practices

general

frot can enjoyable because mutually , simultaneously stimulates genitals of both partners tends produce pleasurable friction against frenulum nerve bundle on underside of each man s penile shaft, below urinary opening (meatus) of penis head (glans penis).


safe sex

since frot non-penetrative sex act, risk of passing sexually transmitted infection (sti/std) requires direct contact between mucous membranes , pre-ejaculate or semen reduced. hiv among infections require such direct contact, , research indicates there no risk of hiv transmission via frot. however, frot can still transmit other sexually transmitted infections, such hpv (which can cause genital warts) , pubic lice (crabs). vaccines available against hpv.


comparison anal sex , debates

some gay men, or men have sex men (msm) in general, prefer engage in frot or other forms of mutual masturbation because find more pleasurable or more affectionate anal sex, preserve technical virginity, or safe sex alternatives anal penetration. preference has led debate in gay male , msm community regarding constitutes real sex or sensual expression of sexual intimacy. frot advocates consider 2 genitals coming mingling, caressing, sliding , rubbing sex more other forms of male sexual activity. other men have sex men associate male masculinity sexual positions of tops , bottoms during anal sex.


during anal sex, insertive partner may referred top or active partner. 1 being penetrated may referred bottom or passive partner. preference either referred versatile. frot advocates insist such roles introduce inequality during sexual intimacy, , frot equal because of mutual genital-genital stimulation. lack of mutual genital stimulation , role asymmetry has led other frot advocates denounce anal sex degrading receptive partner. view of dominance , inequality associated sex roles disputed researchers state not clear specific sexual acts indicative of general patterns of masculinity or dominance in gay male relationship, , that, both partners, anal intercourse can associated being masculine. additionally, frot advocates, such bill weintraub, concerned diseases may acquired through anal sex. in 2005 article in advocate, 1 anal sex opponent said no longer showing anal sex erotic avoid hiv/aids, , opined gay men perceived him antigay when trying keep gay , bisexual men alive , healthy.


the view anal sex should discouraged not supported frot supporters. author joe perez states weintraub , followers have gone overboard in enthusiasm frot claiming supporting frot means disowning anal sex or latter inherently degrading, unnatural, or disease-spreading. says weintraub , supporters views should taken grain of salt if can , hopes more inclusive frot communities.


gay men, , msm in general, prefer anal sex may view [their] version of intercourse , natural apex of sex, wonderful expression of intimacy, , great source of pleasure . psychologist walt odets said, think anal sex has gay men same emotional significance vaginal sex has heterosexuals. act viewed vanilla sex among msm, , thought expected, msm not prefer act. people [anal] because seems taboo or naughty, stated author , sex therapist jack morin. people flavor of dominance , submission... don’t.


msm defend essential validity of anal sex have rejected claims made radical frot advocates. others have @ times disparaged frottage makeshift, second-rate form of male/male intimacy—something better left inexperienced teenagers , closeted older men. odets said, no 1 propose initiate public health measure de-eroticizing vaginal sex. sound ridiculous idea. s no less ridiculous gay men.


the huffington post contributor , sexologist joe kort proposed term side gay men not interested in anal sex , instead prefer kiss, hug , engage in oral sex, rimming, mutual masturbation , rubbing , down on each other , viewing sides gay male sexual preference akin being top, bottom or versatile, , adding whether man enjoys anal sex or not no reflection on sexual orientation, , if s gay, doesn t define whether or not s having sex.








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The battle for tallest status IDS Center

-
the crystal court ids tower ground the owners of capella tower (formerly first bank place) , architects behind design stated rose 774 feet (236 m) tall upon completion in 1992. however, height had been increased due engineering need, according tom o mara, 1 of construction managers @ time of capella tower construction. there ventilation ducts near roof required 14 more inches (36 cm) of height. construction team added 10 inches (25 cm) that, bringing building total of 776 feet 0 inches (236.52 m). in years following completion, actual height became known published in almanacs , other listings of building height. owners of capella tower hesitant claim building taller ids, , deferred honor more well-known structure. area journalists reported on sale of ids center john buck company in 2004 , death of designer philip johnson in 2005, came face-to-face fact roof of tower 1 foot lower neighbor. emporis.com restored ids center first-place status in city in fe...
Read more

Discography Butterfingers (Malaysian band)

-
1 discography 1.1 1994 – 2 tracks untitled recording (demo) 1.2 1995 – 12 goats, 6 oranges , 2 angels (demo) 1.3 1996 – butter couldn t melt (demo) 1.4 1996 – dragon (demo) 1.5 1996 – 1.2 milligrams (butterworld/emi) 1.6 1997 – butter worth pushful (butterworld/emi) 1.7 1999 – transcendence (butterworld/emi) 1.8 2000 – butter late never (unreleased tracks, live , rarities) (butterworld/emi) 1.9 2001 – malayneum (butterworld/emi) 1.10 2003 – best yet come 1994-20xx (butterworld/emi) 1.11 2005 – selamat tinggal dunia (butterworld/emi) 1.12 2008 – kembali (butterworld) 1.13 vcd 1.14 special release/live album 1.15 music videos 1.16 hit songs discography 1994 – 2 tracks untitled recording (demo) 1. girl friday 2. when re addicted (later renamed nicc o tynne ) 1995 – 12 goats, 6 oranges , 2 angels (demo) 1. wet blanket 2. ginseng 3. kindergarten (later renamed hatemaster ) 4. when re addicted (later renamed nicc o tynne ) 5. mystery 6. gum 7. spoilt (later renamed spoilt (in end) ) 1996...
Read more

Timeline Korean DMZ Conflict (1966–1969)

-
1 timeline 1.1 1966 1.2 1967 1.3 1968 1.4 1969 timeline 1966 2 november: 2nd infantry division (2id) patrol (1st battalion, 23rd infantry regiment) ambushed south of dmz. 6 u.s. kia, 1 katusa kia, 1 u.s. wia; unknown kpa losses. private ernest reynolds posthumously awarded silver star actions during ambush. roka patrol ambushed same night. 2 rok kia. 1967 12 february: 2id patrol (3–23 infantry) ambushed south of dmz. 1 u.s. kia; unknown kpa losses. 5 april: 2id guard post engaged kpa infiltrators south of dmz. no u.s. losses; 5 kpa kia. 29 april: 2id patrol ambushed kpa infiltrators south of dmz. no u.s. losses; 1 kpa kia, 1 kpa wia, 1 kpa captured. 22 may: 2id barracks (1–23 infantry) demolished daylight explosion south of dmz. 2 u.s. kia, 17 u.s. wia. 16 july: 2id barrier position #32 overrun. 3 u.s. kia (2-23 infantry), 1 katusa wia. 10 august: 7id construction team (b company 2/31st inf. 7th id) ambushed south of dmz in daylight. 3 u.s. kia, sixteen u.s. wia, 1 wia later died of wo...
Read more